Should universities engage in politics or remain neutral?

Many universities are choosing political neutrality to foster free expression and maintain trust, but this approach poses strategic risks.

By: Andy Cuneo
featured-image

First, it was Harvard. 

Then, Cornell and Northwestern followed.  

Over the last several months, numerous universities have announced their intention to remain politically neutral as the political climate becomes more polarized. As more institutions join the trend, it begs the question: Will this be a lasting approach for higher education, or will more universities re-enter these conversations? And, with apologies to the band Midnight Oil, how do colleges and universities sleep when their beds are burning?

A landscape of political tensions

Today’s social media landscape has become a wasteland of volatility characterized by rising tempers, unsubstantiated claims and a growing unwillingness to listen. Public-facing brands, including universities, that take on political agendas — one way or another — often face scrutiny and even “cancel culture.” For universities, the key consideration is clear: “Is there anything to gain by taking a stance?” 

Brian Kelley, a 20-year public relations professional and vice president of public relations at BlueText, shared his perspective. 

 “Along the way, colleges and universities have lost their role as an arbiter of freethinking and taken a stance on issues,” Kelley notes. “Taking a stance could remove 50% of your support from students, faculty and alumni.”

The case for neutrality

Emerson College made headlines in August when it announced its commitment to political neutrality, emphasizing that neutrality does not mean indifference. Instead, the institution aims to  uphold its “long history of fostering civic engagement and civil discourse.” Sandra Lo, head of global corporate communications for Zoho and a 27-year public relations professional who previously worked with companies such as Adobe and Salesforce, agrees with this approach. 

“Universities should ensure students and faculty maintain the freedom to express their points of view in the classrooms and in public spaces,” said Lo. “Universities should foster meaningful discussions and not dictate right or wrong.”

Political positions and public perception

Kelley suggests that many institutions that have taken political stances did so in response “to the loudest and most vociferous groups that wanted the universities to take a stand.” However, such moves may have been poorly timed. A 2023 Gallup poll revealed that only 36% of respondents expressed confidence in higher education — a steep decrease from 57% in 2015 and 48% in  2018. While rising costs of education contribute to this decline, Kelley believes other factors could play a role in this distrust. 

“Costs and endowments are high, but political agendas are likely eroding [that confidence as well],” Kelley explained.

The strategic gamble of neutrality

Universities that publicly embrace political neutrality could benefit strategically, but they risk the highest potential loss. Outsiders may view these stances as a refusal to support causes, which could backfire. From a public relations perspective, today’s decisions are based on predictions for tomorrow. 

“Universities should ensure students and faculty maintain the freedom to express their points of view in the classrooms and in public spaces … not dictate right or wrong.”

As Kelley put it, “A closed mouth catches no flies; from a communications perspective, you want to be sure you’re not doing any harm to yourself, your stakeholders or the public at large.” Kelley advises institutions to consider the long-term impact of their statements:

“It’s hard to predict. Institutions must think: ‘What am I willing to put on the line today in order to make these statements tomorrow?’ While statements look brave in the moment, often the longer-term effects are not taken into consideration.”

Navigating the path forward

So, what is the next step?  What should universities do to right the ship?

Kelley believes it’s time for higher education institutions to “bring it back to center and regain their status as an arbiter of free expression.” Lo agrees, emphasizing the decision to take a stance should align with the university’s mission.

“It’s a decision where you must balance between short- and long-term impact and it should [mesh] with the university’s mission,” she noted. “Even the policy you come up with is a balancing act between students, faculty and the university’s position.”

Balancing free speech and institutional values

While political statements from universities often arise in response to global and national conflicts, such as the unrest in the Middle East, not all causes are volatile or divisive.

The Harvard Gazette recently highlighted that, while partisan positions can limit freedom of speech, universities should retain “the leeway to comment on issues that are important to its functioning.” With another Presidential election this November, many universities are encouraging thoughtful discussions among their students, faculty and alumni.

“The ability to opine and demonstrate should never be taken away,” said Lo. “This exchange of differing opinions will help the youth bridge this growing divide.”

The road to restoring trust

As institutions like Harvard and Cornell take steps to promote free thinking, the clear goal is to create environments in which students can form their own opinions.

“They must be serious about it,” said Kelley. “But if they are, they’ll get back there.”

In a polarized environment, universities face a difficult decision: remain neutral or take a stand. As more institutions choose the former, they aim to provide a space for free expression and dialogue — a mission that may ultimately restore confidence in higher education.

Perhaps, that’s the best value of all.

Andy Cuneo

Andy Cuneo

Reporter

Andy Cuneo is a 21-year communications professional with a journalism background, having worked at several daily newspapers including the Patriot Ledger and the Boston Globe. He currently works as a global partner communicator for HP.

Newsletter Sign up!

Stay current in digital strategy, brand amplification, design thinking and more.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
The Senate just confirmed Linda McMahon as DOE Secretary. What’s next? article image. A digitally manipulated image featuring the U.S. Department of Education Federal Building placed inside a dark boxing ring. The ropes of the ring surround the building, creating a visual metaphor for conflict. The lighting emphasizes the contrast between the brightly lit government building and the shadowy, worn-down boxing ring.

DOE Secretary Linda McMahon already imposed mass layoffs. What’s next?

Before following President Trump’s direction to ‘put herself out of a job,’ the former wrestling matriarch has other ideas and wants Congress to give her a hand.

Education Administration /
By: Chris Kudialis
Higher ed weighs the impact of Trump’s executive orders on DEI initiatives article image. A woman in a black business suit walks toward a grand, neoclassical-style university building with a red roof and white columns. The sun casts long shadows, highlighting a well-maintained campus with green lawns and a paved walkway leading to the entrance.

Higher ed faces a crossroads over Trump’s executive orders on DEI.

Legal experts and educators debate the future of diversity initiatives in the wake of new federal directives.

Education Administration /
By: Aila Boyd
Higher ed administration gets AI boost article image. A young man wearing glasses and a casual blue t-shirt is smiling while working on a laptop. The image has a futuristic feel, with overlaid lines of programming code and a blurred blue bokeh effect, symbolizing technology, coding, and artificial intelligence.

Higher ed administration gets AI boost.

Working through legitimate concerns, higher ed leaders are finding dynamic ways to integrate AI technology across campus offices.

Student Experience /
By: Aila Boyd
"The NIL Top 10: Who are the highest-paid college athletes?" article image displaying a collage of six college athletes across different sports, each wearing their team uniforms and caught in action. The top row includes a basketball player from North Carolina dribbling the ball, a gymnast on the floor mid-performance, and a football player from Colorado gesturing with his hands after a game. The bottom row shows a Duke basketball player preparing to take a shot, another football player from Colorado looking focused, and an Alabama basketball player pointing confidently.

The NIL Top 10: Who are the highest-paid college athletes?

Growing collective contracts and sponsorship deals have university athletes — both men and women — raking in record paydays.

Marketing & Branding /
By: Chris Kudialis
College admissions try to balance innovation, ethics and equity article image. A close-up of a black and gold pen resting on a printed sheet of code. The words 'accepted' in green and 'denied' in red are overlaid on the text, symbolizing decision-making processes in AI-driven admissions.

College admissions try to balance innovation, ethics and equity.

As AI becomes more integrated into college admissions, institutions are navigating the challenges of maintaining fairness and transparency in the process.

Enrollment /
By: Aila Boyd
Higher ed administration gets AI boost article image. A young man wearing glasses and a casual blue t-shirt is smiling while working on a laptop. The image has a futuristic feel, with overlaid lines of programming code and a blurred blue bokeh effect, symbolizing technology, coding, and artificial intelligence.

Higher ed administration gets AI boost.

Working through legitimate concerns, higher ed leaders are finding dynamic ways to integrate AI technology across campus offices.

Student Experience /
By: Aila Boyd